I think this is an urban legend? It was going around in one of the usenet
groups just a month or so ago.
At 09:59 AM 12/20/2001 -0700, you wrote:
Forwarding from a completely separate forum I found this in -- I have
neither a good inkjet nor b/w paper to test this with, but I thought it
might be interesting to those that do:
>A few years ago a friend of mine, who is both a professional photographer
>and computer geek conducted a heap of tests to find out what type of paper
>was best for his inkjet printer (cost & quality).
>
>The winner? A sheet of unexposed B&W photographic paper, that had been run
>through stop and fixer. It cost less than shiny inkjet paper, and the
>geletine coating absorbed the ink just right to create a good image.
-- dan
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
// richard http://www.imagecraft.com
[ For technical support, please include all previous replies in your msgs. ]
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|