> Those are some nice shots. One thing though the
> resolution seemed pretty bad, this is due to the
> scanner and the file size of the pics, right? How is
> the sharpness of the lens.
Pretty decent; not razor-sharp, but you're right, it's better than those
show.
http://www.danielmitchell.net/large.jpg is a 300dpi scan of one of those.
Things to bear in mind when looking at that: 1. cheapo ISO 400 film. 2.
$1.99 Great Canadian Superstore processing. 3. cheapo flatbed scanner.
Now that I think about it, I do have some slide taken with that lens, but
none of them are particularly good for evaluating resolution, and I don't
have a slide scanner. I'll take a look when I get home, though; I'm curious
to compare now.
-- dan
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|
