Hi Tom,
Where'd you drag that post up from - at least a week old. Do you realise
these posts stay live in the internet for centuries!)
Guilty as accused Your honour.
However, in mitigation the accused notes that merely eleven are Zuiko,
others are as diverse as a Schneider S-Xenar 40/3.5 still attached to a mint
Rollei 35, a Tessar 45/2.8 attached to a Contaflex, and a Voigtlander Apo-
Lanthar 150/4.5 in a square of metal masquerading as a lens-board.
Brian ;-)
>
> Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 21:08:00 -0500
> From: Tom@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [OM] Fungus in lenses
>
> You got ...ism bad.
>
> Tom
>
> On Tuesday, December 11, 2001 at 14:47, Brian Swale
> <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote re "[OM] Fungus in lenses" saying:
> ...
> > Yesterday afternoon we had some nice sunshine for an hour or two - so I got
> > out all my lenses for a UV sunbath. 28 lenses, all in a row, sitting on my
> > window-sill, like chooks on a perch. Some needed it badly. I reviewed the
> > status of all.
...................................................
Zuikoholics, enablers, one and all.
Feeding fantasies, emptying pockets!
---------------------------------------------------
Brian Swale, 140 Panorama Road,
Christchurch 8008, N.Z.
Tel +64 3 326 7447
http://homepages.caverock.net.nz/~bj/photography/
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|