Re: manufacturing dates:
52B 1979-1988
52BB 1988-1996
72B(2.8) 1996-
Roger Key, cph
Whoops, yes - #01F, not 10F! My 90mm/2.5 is coded 52BB and has the 55mm
filter ring. Snagged it with the extension tube, caps and hood for US$100 -
almost unmarked :)
Haven't used it with the tube or the 2X yet - first attempt at macro I
messed up depth of field. Nice portrait lens but! The early version has a
49mm filter ring. There is a later version - 90/2.8 which goes to 1:1
without the extension tube but I believe it isn't as sharp. That version
also comes in AF versions.
The 18F is 44mm long! - with an internal diameter of 39mm although with a
couple of masking projections. Big enough to put a tripod mount on it -
same one that fits the 300/5.6 and some long zooms.
AndrewF
>Oops, you're right. Must have dropped a couple of marbles. I can say it
>works very well with the #01F 2X (at least that's the number on both of
>mine). I don't have an 18F extension tube. I did send a partial answer
>on the vignetting question to Dean Hansen, but guess it went directly to
>him, rather than the list:
>
>First, there are two versions of this lens. There are 3 listing for it
>on eBay at the moment. The first 2 are for the one I have, model 52B,
>The third is different and pretty beat up looking. I assume mine is the
>newer version, but am not sure.
>>>
>>>Moose
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|