I have owned both. I'm on my second 200/4 now (first one got
broken elements). The 200/4 is better to focus with. The F5 is
just a hint too slow.
The 200/4 also makes (with extension tubes) a most wonderful
macro lens. The bokeh is dreamy. However, stopped WAY down, it
gives awesome DOF and sharpness. Size/Weight of the 200/4 is
nearly perfect.
Compared my 200/4 to Joel Wilcox's 180/2.8 and found that his
lens possessed a nice "pop" when focusing in comparison to the
200/4. Sharpness was similar, contrast was better in the 180.
Also shot the same scene with the IS-3 at 180mm. Sharpness was
close enough to be essentially identical.
But I was able to use my tripod. Gotta make sure you have your
quick-release plates with you and not in the back of your Volvo.
AG-Schnozz
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Check out Yahoo! Shopping and Yahoo! Auctions for all of
your unique holiday gifts! Buy at http://shopping.yahoo.com
or bid at http://auctions.yahoo.com
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|