The lens is marked S ZUIKO AUTO-ZOOM 35~70mm 1:3,5~4,5 and uses a 49mm filter.
Are you sure yours is 3.5? It sounds like what you have is the 35-70 f/3.6
I will let others more knowledgeable answer your scanner question more
specifically, burt the question of whether a less expensive scanner will work
for you has a lot to do with what you want to do with the output. If you jsut
want to post picures on the web then your requirments will not be as stringint
as if you want to print 8x10 or larger prints for example.
Jim Couch
Thomas A Simmons wrote:
> 1) After the discussion on the 35-70 lens, I looked again at mine. Is the
> 3.5 - 4.5 version
> marked with just the 3.5? The one I have takes 55MM filters, and has a
> helical device to
> zoom (IE, I twist a ring on the lens)
>
> 2) Scanners: without breaking the bank, which scanner(s) are recommended.
> Let's assume
> that the most important feature is to scan negatives. I have few slides,
> but may try this aspect
> now that I've found this list. That leaves scanning documents and prints in
> decreasing
> importance. SInce Polaroid is going into bankrupcy, I would tend to shy
> away from this unit.
> Is $250.00 USD a reasonable level? (No way could I talk SWMBO into going
> above $500)
>
> Thanks for any replies
>
> Tom
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|