I got a very strange reply from a message I sent to the list yesterday,
replying to John H. that my new credit card processor also asks for the
three-digit code. It seems the letter went to "latinmail.com" and was
rejected...strange in itself, but is anyone savvy enuf to know why it went
there at all when it was only addressed to the OM list?? I'm beginning to hum
the "Twighlight Zone" tune to myself...
Susan in Va
message shown below:
In a message dated 12/11/01 12:01:56 AM Eastern Standard Time,
mailer-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
<< Subj: Mail no entregado
Date: 12/11/01 12:01:56 AM Eastern Standard Time
From: mailer-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: DaEyeGuy@xxxxxxx
El mail no pudo ser entregado debido a que el usuario es inactivo en el
sistema o no existe
Return-Path: <owner-olympus-tramite=latinmail.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-To: latinmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Received: from zuiko.sls.bc.ca (Zuiko.sls.bc.ca [139.142.66.252])
by linux1795.dn.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 085D734664E
for <tramite@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 11 Dec 2001 00:00:08 -0500 (EST)
Received: (qmail 9587 invoked by uid 2); 11 Dec 2001 05:03:05 -0000
Delivered-To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Received: (qmail 9581 invoked from network); 11 Dec 2001 05:03:03 -0000
Received: from slsweb.sls.bc.ca (HELO proxy3.sls.bc.ca) (139.142.66.3)
by zuiko.sls.bc.ca with SMTP; 11 Dec 2001 05:03:03 -0000
Received: FROM fw.sls.bc.ca BY proxy3.sls.bc.ca ; Mon Dec 10 20:54:40 2001
-0800
Received: from imo-d07.mx.aol.com (imo-d07.mx.aol.com [205.188.157.39])
by fw.sls.bc.ca (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA10888
for <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 10 Dec 2001 21:00:02 -0800
From: DaEyeGuy@xxxxxxx
Received: from DaEyeGuy@xxxxxxx
by imo-d07.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v31_r1.9.) id w.c6.329e36c (4332)
for <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 10 Dec 2001 23:54:28 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <c6.329e36c.2946eb83@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 23:54:27 EST
Subject: Re: [OM] notice
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Windows sub 138
Sender: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
John,
My new credit card service provider asks for the same code. Methinks it's
here to stay.
Susan Steele
Virginia USA
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
----------------------- Headers --------------------------------
Return-Path: <mailer-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from rly-za04.mx.aol.com (rly-za04.mail.aol.com [172.31.36.100])
by air-za03.mail.aol.com (v82.22) with ESMTP id MAILINZA37-1211000156; Tue,
11 Dec 2001 00:01:56 -0500
Received: from linux1583.dn.net ([128.242.197.85]) by rly-za04.mx.aol.com
(v82.22) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINZA45-1211000126; Tue, 11 Dec 2001 00:01:26
-0500
Received: from latinmail.com (unknown [209.207.185.14])
by linux1583.dn.net (Postfix) with SMTP id C67268737E
for <DaEyeGuy@xxxxxxx>; Mon, 10 Dec 2001 23:55:34 -0500 (EST)
To: DaEyeGuy@xxxxxxx
From: mailer-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 00:00:35 -0500
Subject: Mail no entregado
X-Mailer: LatinMail v3.0 -- http://www.latinmail.com
Message-Id: <20011211045534.C67268737E >>
Susan Steele
Virginia USA
The best way to forget all your troubles is to wear tight shoes.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|