In <3C15867B.3DC08E46@xxxxxxxxxx>, on 12/11/01 at 12:07 PM,
"C.H.Ling" <chling@xxxxxxxxxx> said:
>Their photos are good, but IMHO mostly are due the inherent digital
>characteristic, good color rendering is much easier to obtain and you
>can shoot hundred to select one. Most other film shooter just failed to
>have the good skill and tool to scan their works especially negative.
>At the mean time they seems can spend lots of time to shoot, it is
>their job?
If it's their editing that results in such quality, then they're among
the best editors of whom I have ever heard. Digital ease is something I
didn't consider; you are probably right. I don't know what their "real"
jobs are; my impression was that they are amateurs. Remember the series
that Jaco did to and from his travels to work? A spectacular series.
When I first looked at the set of pictures, I remarked on his very fine
graphic sense. The camera helps, no doubt; but the visual skills there
are pretty unusual, I think. Sort of like the stars of the OM list,
what?
---------------------------------------------
les clark / edgewater, nj / usa
---------------------------------------------
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|