Details, details.... ;-9
Tom
On Sunday, December 09, 2001 at 14:32, John A. Lind
<olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote re "Re: [OM] Re: 40mm Lens Price" saying:
> At 18:23 12/9/01, Tom Abacurial wrote:
> >The seller says "the smallest of the OM system lenses" but it's twice the
> >size of the 20/3.5 and still bigger than the 38/3.5 ;-)
> >
> >Tom
>
> Perhaps, but don't forget the Objective Lens Mount and Bellows are required
> to use the two lenses you listed. These *greatly* increase size and
> weight. They're not required for the 40/2, which can also focus to
> "infinity!" ;-)
------- Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur -----------------
,__@ Tom A. Trottier +1 613 860-6633
fax:231-6115
_-\_<, 758 Albert St.,Ottawa Ont. Canada K1R
7V8
(*)/'(*) ICQ:57647974 Tom@xxxxxxxxxxxxx N45.412
W75.714
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Laws are the spider's webs which, if anything small falls
into them
they ensnare it, but large things break through and
escape.
--Solon, statesman (c.638-c558 BCE)
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little
temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." --
Benjamin Franklin
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|