From: "Giles" <cnocbui@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In my situation, the difference has been big, I am not sure I would
use the term 'huge'.
Giles
>Do you who have the experience notice a HUGE difference between
>scanned prints and scanned negatives? Or is the difference
>"neglectable"?
If you want 'huge,' you have to step up to a drum scanner. ;-)
Regards,
John
Actually, that does not seem to be true anymore, at least for some
drum scanners. Here are a couple of review sites for the Nikon 8000
and the Polaroid SS120 in which the differences with an Imacon
Flextight appear to be negligible and some of the scans of the less
expensive scanners appear to be superior in sharpness to the drum
scanner. You can view the on line scans or, if you want, download the
complete image file to view it in Photoshop.
http://www.btinternet.com/~ian.lyons/ss120/ss120_1.htm
http://luminous-landscape.com/nikon-8000.htm
--
Winsor Crosby
Long Beach, California
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|