Olafo,
I also have the Colourplan 90/2.5 and P255, it seems not really
"great" as I can see some details with microscope but not with
projection, especially with projection smaller than 100 inch width.
When I heard Gary R. mentioned how good his Kodak projector lens was,
I really want to get one to compare (but I have no Kodak projector and
it is no common here also). He also mentioned the later Leica Super
Colourplan seems much better, it is something that we can reach, I
think you should try one.
C.H.Ling
Olaf Greve wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > Carousel. Just as a camera lens quality is of overwhelming importance, it
> > is on a projector also (think of it as a camera working in reverse).
>
> I second that!
> Earlier this year Hans and Erwin opened my eyes regarding the importance of
> a good projector lens, I then upgraded my father's old Rollei projector
> (non-AF, with a generic 85/2.8 "plastic" lens), to a Leica Pradovit P155
> (AF) with a Leica Colorplan 90/2.5 in it. Good grief, what a difference that
> made! The projector itself is already much nicer than the Rollei, but the
> lens really made a tremendous difference.
>
> Then a thing I always wondered about: why is it that in the USA the
> carrousel type projectors seem to be the most popular ones, and over here
> the ones with straight trays?!?
>
> Cheers!
> Olafo
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|