Thanks for the note Tom. It was indeed handheld, leaning into a bush, on tippy
toes. The web was under the roof overhang.
Scanned with my relatively new Nikon Coolscan IV ED, modest cropping and level
adjustment in photoshop. I always scan with 12 bits per pixel (about a 70 MB
file) and later reduce to 8.
I probably took 30 shots of this guy (gal), getting progressively closer as I
was afraid of disturbing it. I think I still have some shots on a roll of
Kodachrome I took and don't have back yet.
-Dick
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 09:00:39 -0600
From: "Tom Scales" <tscales@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [OM] Speaking of Spiders
Wow, handheld?
That is an incredible shot -- seems like our week for great spider pics.
What did you scan that with? It came through wonderful. Lots of detail.
Tom
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 08:19:52 -0600
From: "Richard Locke" <dtlocke@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: [OM] Speaking of Spiders
Speaking of spiders...
Here's a spider hanging around the B&B we stayed at in Wimberly, TX. OM2s
(thanks Tom!), Vivitar 90mm macro (thanks to another list member whose name I
forget, sorry), handheld, Kodak RG 100 print film, ~f8 at about 1/250 plus or
minus one fstop in either direction. I was bracketing around "sunny 16."
I named him "Boris," which my wife didn't understand as she wasn't really into
The Who way back when ;-)
Can anyone definitively identify Boris?
- -Dick, dtlocke@xxxxxxxx
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|