Subject: | Re: [OM] The elusive OM-3Ti |
---|---|
From: | Winsor Crosby <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 9 Nov 2001 12:23:20 -0800 |
I wasn't suggesting an R6. Just pointing out that "overpriced" depends on your point of view.On Fri, 9 Nov 2001, Winsor Crosby wrote:Doesn't the OM3, like the OM4 suffer from the dreaded battery consumption defect?Yes and no. The OM-3 circuit can have a high current drain, but that is offset by the fact that it doesn't use an electomagnet for shutter timing (it's mechanical). The net result is that OM-3's don't eat up batteries as bad as misbehaving OM-4's.How much is a Leica R6?About $2K, but why go with an R6? If you're going to go with Leica, go with an M series. -mark -- Winsor Crosby Long Beach, California, USA mailto:wincros@xxxxxxxxxxx < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
Previous by Date: | RE: [OM] Re: [OT] SUV's and Zuiko's, Gene Kahn |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Huh?!?!?, Roger Wesson |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] and now for a real question... trip to antartica..., Terry and Tracey |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] The elusive OM-3Ti, Stephan VAN DEN ZEGEL |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |