Subject: | Re: [OM] OT: Computers |
---|---|
From: | Henrik Dahl <hdahl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 6 Nov 2001 02:29:01 +0100 |
Careful Les - I think we're in serious danger of raising the tone here! Next it'll be questions like - does my E10 have intelligence and, if so, should I switch it off? If my OM2 was fired by a lightning detector and I wasn't there, did it really take a photograph? Can I reinvent myself existentially as a photographer? Would there be cameras in the afterlife and, if so, what could we photograph? What human need does an OM-1 satisfy? Can a mechanism have an aesthetic? Hmmmmmmm. The headache's back. AndrewF Careful Andrew - I think you're getting a little On Topic there... Henrik Dahl < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: [OM] E-10, Wayne Harridge |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [OM] E-10 vs. E-20 /computer wars, Gregg Iverson |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] OT: Computers, andrew fildes |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] OT: Computers, ll . clark |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |