You noticed that too, eh? Must've been the $79 price tag that got your
addicted little heart pumping, only to be let down when you looked at
the pic. :-)
Regards,
Chris
On 1 Nov 2001, at 6:07, Tom Scales wrote:
> I have no opinion other than 'be careful'. They have a lens listed as a
> 35-70/3.5-4.5. When you click on the picture, it is a 35-70/3.5-4.8. Huge
> difference.
>
> Other than that, prices are on the high side.
>
> Tom
>
> > Don't all rush at once; I was doing a search using Google, and this page
> > turned up.
> >
> > I don't know what the perception is of Ritzcam, but this looks like a
> > page
> to
> > bookmark.
> >
> > http://www.ritzcam.com/cgi-local/listing.pl?sort=d&cat800=800
> >
> > Brian
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
-------------------------------------------------
Chris O'Neill (chris@xxxxxxxxx)
Joinco Enterprises Inc., Edmonton, AB Canada
Web: http://www.joinco.ca
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|