Hi CH
Sometime ago, you summarized your brief opinions of the important
advantages or disadvantages of various Zuiko lenses you have used. I have
since then lost the file since my computer had problems with the hard disk
a few months ago. Would you mind resending that message (if you can still
recall it) or just repeating theopinion for everyone's benefit?
It would be great if we could put together a file summarizing comments to
various zuiko lenses leading to a ranking of zuiko "stars" and "dogs."
Regards
Titoy
----------
> From: John Hudson <jahudson@xxxxxxx>
> To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [OM] Lens sharpness
> Date: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 10:19 AM
>
> "C.H.Ling" wrote:
> >
> > If you expect the 35-70/3.5-4.5 is better than the 35-105 you will be
> > disappointed. Zuiko 35-105 is a very sharp, high resolution and high
> > contrast lens. The built quality is better than the 35-70 too, it is
> > way too plastic.
>
>
> Can someone out there please tell me whether "high resolution" and "high
> contrast" are one and the same and if not how it might be possible to
> have a "high resolution" and "low contrast" lens or vice versa
>
> John Hudson
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|