The lens doesn't say VMC. Maybe I should have hunted better?
Were there two versions? Does yours say VMC on the lens ring?
Maybe you should do the test, as you have the best competition, the Tamron
180/2.5 SP-ED.
Skip
****** I M P O R T A N T R E P L Y I N F O ************
Please adddress ALL offlist messages to skipwilliams@xxxxxxxxx
This hotmail.com email address is ONLY used for this mailing list
subscription and I will probably not notice any private messages addressed
here.
***********************************************************
From: Pandionhalietius@xxxxxxx
Reply-To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [OM] Vivitar S1 200/3 vs. 180/2.8 and Tamron 180mm f2.5
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 13:55:29 EST
In a message dated 10/29/01 9:35:33 AM Pacific Standard Time,
skipwilliamsom@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:
> I'd like to do is to shoot some comparison slides with the two lenses.
Is
> there anyone out there willing to part with their 180/2.8 for a few
weeks
> for me to shoot some tests? I'd pay shipping both ways.
>
> Skip
>
Skip, is it the VMC version of the lens (Vivitar Series 200mm f3)?
I have a minty 200/3 VMC and a Tamron 180/2.5 EX+ that I will get some
test
shots together as well.
The close focus on these two lenses is amazing.
If anyone has shot with a Tamron 300/2.8 (IF version) or the Tamron 400/f4
and not the 180/2.5, the 180 is a baby version of those lenses right down
to
the detachable (neat) lens hood.
The Tamron, ofcourse, takes their 1.4x SP converter which is right up there
with the Zuiko 1.4x (I shoot with as well).
John R
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|