Take a look at Skip's recently enhanced history data. Your 3.6 is averaging
almost double the sales price of it's closest competitor (the 3.5/4.5). And
the 4 languishes behind, barely keeping ahead of the 'floater' 3.5/4.8.
Most of the list (myself included here) would advise you to keep the 3.6...
if you're scarcely using it, why do you think you'd use the 4 any more?
IOW, the 3.6 was considered the premier Zuiko zoom in that range at the
time. Of course, subsequently supplanted by the 35-80/2.8, which runs about
quadruple the money.
Keep the 3.6
-----Original Message-----
From: William Clark [mailto:wclark@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 6:38 AM
To: 'Olympus List'
Subject: [OM] OM zoom advice needed
Sensitivity: Private
Hey all
I have the 35-70 3.6 zoom, which I really do not use all that much.
I was thinking of getting the f4 to replace it from a local shop and pocket
the change from selling thr 3.6. I know there are also 3.5-4.5 and 3.5-4.8
zooms. Does anyone know of the quality of the non-3.6 zooms or what I
should think about doing?
Thanks in advance....
-Bill
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|