I've gotta weigh in here...
Definately 1-4(n?) for the OM-1 and the beattie counter-part for the
OM-4. (more like a 2-4) I wish I had a 1-8 for the occasional astro
stuff I do, but
I don't do enough of that, and the -4's are good enough for me as far as
astro.
All I need in the viewfinder is a fine matte and a circle to tell me
where the meter
is pointing at...all of the micro-prisms and split screens just seemed to
get in the
way...if I did more archi. type stuff, I'd probably send my screens to JH
for etching
(or do it myself and then have to buy more <g>) But I don't have a shift
lens, so the
point is moot anyway...
My .002 FRN's...
Bill >; P
"Life unfolds on a great sheet called Time (film)*,
and once finished (developed)* is gone(here)* forever..."
*provided ya have a good archival system in place.
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2001 12:04:23 +0200
From: "Olaf Greve" <o.greve@xxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [OM] Poll on Focusing Screens
2-13 for me.
I've used the 1-4n, 1-10, 1-12, 1-13 (both in OM-40 as well as normal (=
darker) version), the 2-4 and the 2-13, and my absolute favourite is the
2-13: bright and with the focussing aids, which I, for one person,
actually
do like.
Cheers!
Olafo
________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|