Subject: | Re: [OM] Zuiko 50 1.4 vs 50 1.8 |
---|---|
From: | Bob <bokap1@xxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 26 Sep 2001 11:11:44 -0700 |
I really never used the 28 so it was worth it for me to trade since I would use the 50. I was told the 28 was not worth more much since it was f3.5. Bob < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] [OT] Sensia II vs. Provia. Was: Kodachrome vs Provia, Bernd Moeller |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [OM] no more carryons?, Thomas Heide Clausen |
Previous by Thread: | RE: [OM] Zuiko 50 1.4 vs 50 1.8, Timpe, Jim |
Next by Thread: | RE: [OM] Zuiko 50 1.4 vs 50 1.8, Timpe, Jim |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |