I have a Soligor 200/2.8 that I pikced up from a list member that also does a
very
nice job. Don't have a Zuiko 180/2.8 to compare it to, but it does compare well
to
my 200/4 Zuiko.
Jim Couch
"C.H.Ling" wrote:
> LD not necessary means better performance, lots of new Sigma Zoom
> claim APO design, but I got a 75-300 APO that was really bad at the
> long end. Have you did any comparison between Zuiko 180/2.8 and Tamron
> 180/2.5? I think Zuiko 180/2.8 might lost on the chroma (as it is
> really bad at high-light area) but the resolution and tonal rendering
> of Zuiko 180 is great... okay you may know more about the Tamron.
>
> C.H.Ling
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|