>Since this topic is still going and is at least on topic, I'll add my
> >input. I would choose the OM-4Ti and the 35/2. I would really, really
>miss the 100/2, but my experience is that you can more often than not get
>closer, but it's sometimes impossible to get farther away. And, oh, how I
>would miss the macro capability of other lenses.
> Disagree. It's far more often the case that you can't get close enough.
Tris
Depends on how bold you are. Ever had your back to a wall and still
couldn't include everything you wanted in the frame? Even if you
can't get as close as you want, you can always crop and enlarge.
And the 35/2 is one helluva great lens, one of the best of the
Zuikos. Getting closer, unless physically impossible, is sometimes
just a matter of cojones.
Walt Wayman
Yup, and when you get close the non tele lenses make very nice
perspectives; like a closeup face in one half of the pic and a well
bokeehd (?) street in the background. Nothing like a closeup with a
24mm IMveryHO.
Henrik Dahl
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|