Yeah,
I thought about that too, having taken those color-blind tests as a
kid. What about people who may be able to see those bits on the original photo
though. I was thinking of some sort of clearcoat which when the original photo
is viewed can't be seen, but when scanned a part of the coating would be
encoded. I don't know just brainstormin'
Matt
Enjoy when you can, and endure when you must.
~Johann Wolfgang von Goethe (1749 - 1832)
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 9/17/01 at 7:51 PM W.Xato wrote:
>There could be a way to mark a digitally produced
>photo. Remember the color-blind test that hides
>certain number is a bunch of colored dots? If you had
>colored inks whose spectral response was different
>than the sensivity of the human eye, you could hide
>informationthere without being able to visually see
>it.
>
>Warren
>
>>
>> From: "John Hudson"
>> >
>> > Are there any means whereby a professional photo
>> lab can embody a symbol
>> > or mark into a photo print during the printing
>> process which would be
>> > invisible to the human eye but which would be
>> detected by a scanner and
>> > would show up very clearly on the digital image
>> file?
>> >
>
>
>=====
>Warren Xato
>
>For where to go when you know when
>-PhotoDates-and-Places@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>__________________________________________________
>Terrorist Attacks on U.S. - How can you help?
>Donate cash, emergency relief information
>http://dailynews.yahoo.com/fc/US/Emergency_Information/
>
>< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|