ML Archiv: Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!

Olympus-OM

Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!

from Jim Couch

Subject:	Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!
From:	Jim Couch <JamesBCouch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 14 Sep 2001 07:52:05 -0700

I would say you have some problem with your system. I have shot with both t32
and t20s in many combinations with an OM-2 in OTF for 20+ years and gotten
excellent results. Very few have been improperly exposed.

Jim Couch



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, jlamadoo, home account Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Larry Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, John Hermanson Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Charles Loeven Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Jim Couch <= Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Henrik Dahl Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, c.e.packard Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, DaEyeGuy Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, andrew fildes Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Mickey Trageser Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Jim Couch Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, John Hermanson Re: Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Wayne Harridge Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Bill Stanke Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, DaEyeGuy

Previous by Date:	[OM] Please check a link for me on the UOWPG, Garth Wood
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Jim Couch
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Charles Loeven
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Henrik Dahl
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]