Subject: | Re: [OM] Scanning trouble |
---|---|
From: | Garth Wood <garth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 13 Sep 2001 10:57:26 -0600 |
At 09:10 AM 9/13/01 -0700, Charlie Loeven wrote: [snip] I thought that a good way to make a transition from the understandable slew I think you mean "moiré". Yes, it's a problem, although most modern scanning software (starting, IIRC, with Ofoto back in the early 1990s) has ways of reducing or eliminating these artifacts. I know that my Microtek scanner (about six or seven years old) has software that does this automagically. Try the following: do *several* scans of the image, moving the photo (I'm assuming you have a print and you're using a flatbed scanner) a little bit to the left or right. Now rotate the photo, thirty or forty-five degrees, and scan again. One of these scans *may* be better than the others. As well, check your scanner's software and documentation to see if it has any built-in moiré-reduction capability which needs to be either activated or tweaked. Finally, check out www.scantips.com. There may be further hints there. Good luck! Garth < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Moderately [OT] XA question, Ken N |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: America: The good Neighbor, M. Sparks |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Scanning trouble, Charles Loeven |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Scanning trouble, Charles Loeven |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |