I have three Zuiko 35-70/3.5-4.5s (in various condition states) as well as a
35-70/3.6. I wasn't suggesting this lens as an 'instead of', merely as a
far less costly alternative. Faster alternative as well, I might add.
Repeat, not better, just less costly and faster.
-----Original Message-----
From: Tris Schuler [mailto:tristanjohn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 10:21 AM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Soligor 35-70mm
That may or may not be a good lens, but why purchase a Soligor when you can
easily buy a Zuiko? And for what, a few dollars more, maybe even the same
price as the Soligor?
If anyone on the list has interest, I have a Zuiko 35-70mm f3.5-5.6 (close
focus) in excellent condition. I've used this lens a lot myself and its
operation is flawless, it's images are superb. I finally broke down and
bought a Zuiko f3.6 so the former lens is now something I have no use for.
I'd be hard pressed to tell the difference between its image quality and
that of the "better" lens I now own, though. Also, it is light and compact
and easy to operate in the field. A honey.
Tris
>I've mentioned this lens before, I have an example and really do like it
for
>those more difficult low light situations. I know that the description
>isn't glowing (fair shape), but it looks pretty good in the photos. An
>opportunity to get a bargain, user perhaps. No connection to seller etc.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|