Using Digital Ice on my Acer 2740 takes about 3 times as long as a 24 bit
high quality scan. The effect does not cause any loss of quality, but also
does not obviate the need to look over the scan closely and do some hand
work. In some cases, the repair by Digital Ice still requires some 'clone'
work to fully erase the flaws. I wish there was some way to adjust/refine
the effects of Ice.
-Mickey
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chip Stratton" <cstrat@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:50 PM
Subject: RE: [OM] An interesting invitation
> If you value your time, you'll certainly use the Digital Ice scratch &
dust
> removal feature - huge timesaver for me, anyway. I couldn't find any loss
of
> quality when scanning with Digital Ice on on my LS-2000.
>
> So tell me how you are using the roll film adapter:
>
> 1. Full res scans of entire 36 frame roll (gotta be 15 gigabytes there at
> least)
>
> or
>
> 2. Quick scan a roll at lesser resolution to decide which ones you want at
> high resolution
>
> And how much was the roll film adapter? Sure would like that setup.....
>
> Chip
>
> >
> > I just received an interesting invitation. I'd posted on the
filmscanners
> > list that I rarely felt the need to use Digital ICE (a position I
> > have since
> > reversed). I mentioned I lived in Austin (the home of Applied Science
> > Fiction).
> >
> > I got a nice note Jack Phipps from ASF. He monitors and contributes to
the
> > list. He invited me to come take a tour, an offer I fully intend
> > to accept.
> > Should be downright fascinating.
> >
> > Tom
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|