Subject: | Re: [OM] Oh no, will the Zuikoholic defect? |
---|---|
From: | "Tom Scales" <tscales@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sun, 9 Sep 2001 18:23:30 -0500 |
Now that was fascinating reading. So far, the arguement seems to be to stick with my OM equipment. Not like I don't have enough of it..... Guess I'll hold off as long as I can and wait for technology to improve. I'm still intrigued though. Might blow the money to rent a system and see what I think. I'd miss the lightweight OM though. Tom ----- Original Message ----- From: "M. Royer" <snip> http://people.smu.edu/rmonagha/third/af.html > > Mark LLoyd > < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Oh no, will the Zuikoholic defect?, Tom Scales |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Need info on the Olympus 35 RD, M. Royer |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Oh no, will the Zuikoholic defect?, M. Royer |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Need info on the Olympus 35 RD, M. Royer |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |