I have tried a roll of Portra 160VC, the print from one hour lab is
very flat, tried to scan with my LS2000, looks the same, much poor
than many other color film I have used. It turned a sunny day into
overcast day, I think it is not good for general purpose, may be only
for portrait.
I prefer the Ektarpress 100 (now Supra 100) and 400 much more, the 400
is very fine grain when scanned and color looks quite accurate.
C.H.Ling
Dave Bulger wrote:
>
> I've just recently started using Portra 160NC myself and LOVE the
> results. Skin tones, contrast, saturation are perfect for people and
> portraiture.
>
> It scans a bit flat on my evil Olympus ES10S, but that could very well
> be the ES10 demons. The film prints beautifully.
>
> Dave
>
> I'm anxious to see the photographic results. I have my first
> roll of Portra
> 160NC in the refer, awaiting use. I'll probably get a roll of
> 400NC as well,
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|