Given the subjects you mention and assuming a tripod is used, you probably
want 100 ASA or slower. Presumably every type of film
sold will have its adherents (usually based on inadequate testing and
comparison). So perhaps a flow chart is in order:
Own developing?
No > Talk to your lab. What will they best develop for your needs?
Yes > Are you a careful worker interested in making your own tests?
Yes > Consider a modern T-grain film (Ilford Delta or Kodak TMX).
These have the *potential* for highest control, tone range, etc.
No > Consider a "conventional" emulsion, as these typically
tolerate greater slop in the darkroom. (Ilford FP4+ is perhaps most widely
loved, but every company makes something)
There are plenty of more unusual films, but if you are just starting
out...
Personally, I think film doesn't matter much. Technique matters the most.
Followed by filters (Orange vs. Pol, etc.).
Followed by development/contrast/exposure control.
Followed by paper choice.
Followed by film.
> From: "johnsonpa" <johnsonpa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> I need some advice on what B&W film I need to take to Palmyra.
> I want to take a few rolls b/c I thought it might be the best way to capture
> all the rusted WWII stuff the navy left behind.
=====
Eric Pederson
epederso@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (no "n" in "epederso")
Professional home page:
http://logos.uoregon.edu/uoling/faculty/pederson/pederson.html
Personal home page:
http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~epederso/
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|