If you haven't, you should try the 135/2.8. I've gotten wonderful images
out of that lens, and I have a silvernose version.
Skip
****** I M P O R T A N T R E P L Y I N F O ************
Please adddress ALL offlist messages to skipwilliams@xxxxxxxxx
This hotmail.com email address is ONLY used for this mailing list
subscription and I will probably not notice any private messages addressed
here.
***********************************************************
From: Ken N <image66@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Zuikoholicism in remission
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 08:54:49 -0700 (PDT)
I know the first step to destruction is denial, but...
As you all remember, I ordered a 135/3.5 from our favorite
enabler. It came and, wow was it beautiful. I went ahead and
used it for a portrait session. Wonderful little lens and I do
recommend that people check it out. However, a friend of mine
needed it more than I did. So, can you believe it? I let him
buy it instead of me!
I thought I'd like the lens, and I do, but the reality is I like
my 100/2.8 SOOO MUCH MORE, that the 135/3.5 kinda seemed a
little redundant.
Of course, had it been a silvernose...
AG-Schnozz
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com/
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|