Subject: | Re: [OM] eyesight vs. focusing |
---|---|
From: | Winsor Crosby <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 8 Aug 2001 14:39:43 -0700 |
Hi! When you are nearsighted, but do not wear glasses, there is possibility that the pictures will not be sharp. The image you see on focus screen is sharp, but in real it is not sharp, because your sight is unsharp. You should wear glasses or contact lenses when you are taking pictures. Regards Marcin "Richard F. Man" wrote:Something I always wanted to ask. Lets say if I am slightly nearsighted. If I don't use the dioptic (?sp) adjustment, I can still get a the focusing screen "in-focus." But is the image really in focus in that case? And what exactly does the dioptic (?sp) adjustment do? Does it affect the> answer to the previous question? I do not think that is really true. It would be true if the eyepiece worked like a telescope or microscope, i.e., without a screen. The lens projects an image on the screen. Your eye then evaluates the sharpness of the image. Even if your eye needs correction you can focus the camera accurately if you can see a sharp image on the screen. -- Winsor Crosby Long Beach, California, USA mailto:wincros@xxxxxxxxxxx < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] OM2000, John Hermanson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] eyesight vs. focusing, Ken N |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] eyesight vs. focusing, Marcin Kost |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] eyesight vs. focusing, John A. Lind |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |