Subject: | Re: [OM] Noctilux versus Zuiko [was: [OM] While we were fighting...[originally mailed Thurs. AM]] |
---|---|
From: | "O.C" <oben@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 06 Aug 2001 17:33:17 +1000 |
I take all lens tests with a grain of salt unless the grader of the photos can say that they were truly blinded to (doesn't know) the lens that actually took the picture. I think there is going to be bias otherwise. I do take MTF testing, at least on this site, with a grain of salt. I think the Zuiko 28/2 probably is better than 2.6 and better than the 200/4 which gets the same score.-- Winsor Crosby Long Beach, California Dr. Oben O. Candemir MBBS Syd Uni. < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Noctilux versus Zuiko [was: [OM] While we werefighting...[originally mailed Thurs. AM]], Mark Hammons |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Golden OM-1, O.C |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Noctilux versus Zuiko [was: [OM] While we werefighting...[originally mailed Thurs. AM]], Mark Hammons |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Exciting Times on the Internet. Totally OT., DBellamy2k |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |