I was afraid there would be problems with an adapter. Oh well, was
worth a try ;-|
GeoW
On 5 Aug 2001, at 10:36, Stephen Border wrote:
From: "Stephen Border" <sborder@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [OM] Fish-Eye on the cheap
Date sent: Sun, 5 Aug 2001 10:36:44 +1000
Send reply to: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> I have a 17/2.8 from the same manufacturer (BeLOMO). I've found it a
> good performer but never tried it out on the OM. Mine has a M42 mount
> and a Contax/Yashica adaptor so fits my old Yashica FX-D. I believe
> the problem with M42 to OM adapters is they require an optical
> element, effectively increasing the focal length. Recently obtained a
> Zuiko 16/3.5 so the 17 probably won't see much service from now on.
>
> Stephen
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of gwsears
> Sent: Sunday, 5 August 2001 10:22 AM
> To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [OM] Fish-Eye on the cheap
>
>
> Anyone had experence with this Russian fish? Wonder if there is
> any way to mount on an OM.
>
> http://www.geocities.com/belshop/
>
> GeoW
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|