Or the Tokina AT-X 90/2.5 .... This along with the Zuiko posted at:
http://www.photodo.com/prod/lens/detail/Ol90_2macro-916.shtml
(Olympus)
http://www.photodo.com/prod/lens/detail/ToAT-X90_25macro-855.shtml
(Tokina)
These tests rate the Tokina better. Because of this, these tests might be
knocked, but for a buck fifty, compared to 6 or 7 "c" notes... this lens
hardly can be beat, especially by those who don't have extra dollars coming
out of every crevice, and are "focusing" on the photography :o) (being
serious here, by not attaching value coz the name Zuiko is on it)
Larry
> Mark H. writes:
>
> << I'd like to see the Zuiko 90/2 Macro go up against the Leica 100 APO
> Macro Elmarit-R (F2.8), or even the older 100 Macro Elmar-R (F4). >>
>
> How about the:
>
> Leitz 90mm f/2 Summicron-R (1978 era 3-cam)
> Leitz 90mm f/2.0 APO-Summicron-M
> Leitz 100mm Macro Elmar
>
> st >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|