I saw a very interesting link this week where a guy did some relatively
methodical testing of several Nikon, Leica, and Voigtlander lenses against
one another. Many others will also find it light reading.
http://members.home.net/chefurka/Photo/LensTests/LensTests.html
Skip
****** I M P O R T A N T R E P L Y I N F O ************
Please adddress ALL offlist messages to skipwilliams@xxxxxxxxx
This email address is ONLY used for this mailing list subscription and
posting purposes. I read the list via Hotmail.com or the web-based archives
to keep the traffing down on my email account.
I will probably not notice any private messages addressed to this
HOtmail.com email address.
***********************************************************
From: Gary Reese <pcacala@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [OM] 50mm 2.0 macro lens
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2001 08:58:18 -0700
Hi Skip:
<< I thought I had remembered another test of the 50/2 in addition to
the one you mention, but my memory may fail me there. >>
About 3 or 3 1/2 years ago I took the old 1980s era Popular Photography
silt image contrast data and made a comparison posting here. It was
against the 50mm f/2 Leitz Summicron-R. Pretty much a dead heat, but
there were areas in which one or the other excelled.
Gary Reese
Las Vegas, NV
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|