Same here, I have three Pen FTs, one for spare part. One with half
mirror replaced with an OM-1 mirror (trimmed). Replacing the mirror is
not a difficult job and you got a Pen FV. The Pen FT is quite
repairable, the shutter mechanism is well built and I think it rare
need spare parts except the half mirror and focusing screen. I think
they both are not available and you have to get a spare part camera
for it. The shutter of Pen FT is not very accurate (at least for four
Pen FT I have checked) but they are all within 1/3 stops except
1/500s, which is 0.7-0.8 stop over (slow).
I got my Pen system only around 4 months. Haven't pay with all lenses
I have (20/3.5, 38/1.8, 50-90/3.5, 70/2, 100/3.5 and 150/4). But
generally the lenses are very good especially the 38/1.8 and 50-90
zoom, the 70/2 seems to have lower contrast, I think it was design as
a Portrait lens. The 100/3.5 and 20/3.5 looked very sharp in my first
impression.
The frame size is a bit small that lead to a demand of a 4000dpi
scanner. Still thinking about to invest on a Polaroid SS4000 scanner
but the 3.4 DMax seems quite low for thicker slides.
C.H.Ling
Skip Williams wrote:
>
> Look on my site for several references and scans of original Pen F/FT
> promotional literature here: http://www.skipwilliams.com/olympus/non_om.htm
>
> For my opinion: Very nicely made cameras. Original Pen F was a
> double-stroke, ground-glass focuser. No in-camera meter. Pen FT was
> single-stroke w/microprism focusing, uncoupled in-camera meter (translate:
> pain in the ass to use).
>
> OM-System Zuikos and all other non-Pen FT lenses, function at ~1.5x
> effective focal length. I.e., normal on a Pen FT: 38-42mm. Remember that
> you only get automatic diaphragm with Pen F/FT Zuiko lenses. All others,
> including OM-system lenses are used in stop-down mode.
>
> Nice features? Small size, small high-quality lenses, flash synch all the
> way to 1/500. Generally high build quality. Pen F's are more prone to
> failure, as I understand.
>
> Cons? Dust tends to get in where the film wind is, so they are often dirty.
> Pen FT's meter steals ~1 stop of light vs Pen F. (Pen FV's are really the
> best shooters, as they don't have meters)
>
> Repairable? Sure, but catestrophic failures will require cannibalization of
> other body or a stock of long-discontinued spare parts.
>
> Skip
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|