Hi,
I worked with this lens a lot and I had lots of experiences
with it. At f3,5 terribly soft; at f5,6 much better resolution,
best at f8 and f11! I changed it for my 180/2,8 ;-) but I took
good pictures with it. If you want to have a look to them...
http://victorian.fortunecity.com/byzantium/656/newom4ti.html
All the photos taken with telephoto, were using 135/3,5!!!
I´ll never forget it but I prefer now working with my 180/2,8
and my new Winder 2!
Dave
gries wrote:
>
> Is there anyone who would like to give their opinion about the virtues
> of the 135/2.8 over the 3.5? my disease is worsening, and I now believe
> that one is soon destined for my camera case....
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
--
------------------------------------------------------------
Unofficial Olympus web page
http://victorian.fortunecity.com/byzantium/656/index.html
Unofficial Olympus Gallery
http://www.taiga.ca/~gallery/subpages/irissari/irissari.html
------------------------------------------------------------
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|