Subject: | Re: [OM] 2X-A and Zuiko surgery |
---|---|
From: | Walt Wayman <HIWAYMAN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 20 Jul 2001 14:08:06 -0400 |
I wrote, in error: >Yes, but that makes an f/10 zoom, and it's big, and heavy. I would never >consider the 50-250/5. Not ever. :) It's the 85-250/5 I would never consider, and I take back anything I might've said about *Bay. Walt < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] OT movie reference, Tom Scales |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] silver nose (not related to Rudolph), Tom Scales |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] 65-200 vs. 50-250, Jim Brokaw |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Import duties etc, B Gray |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |