Excellent! :)
I'd bought the 90mm f2 some weeks ago and didn't have the hood! I had just
emailed the OM equipment supplier in Australia looking for one. They didn't
have it! So if its true and I have no reason to doubt you, its a bonus to me!
The picture has a slide on hood that looks rather long so yes I see what
you mean. The 35-70 is meant to be a bayonet if I remember correctly.
If anyone has a spare 35-70 f3.6 hood then I'd be interested in talking.
Thanks
Oben
At 11:10 AM Sunday 8/07/2001, you wrote:
Oben,
Nice buy, but I think that the hood pictured with that lens is the
90/2-135/4.5 hood, not the correct hood. Since I don't have a 35-70/3.6,
I'm not 100ure, but I'm 95%.
Can someone confirm my suspicious nature?
Skip
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|