Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] OT Tallest tree

Subject: Re: [OM] OT Tallest tree
From: "Joel Wilcox" <jdubikins@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2001 08:04:26 -0500
From: andrew fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Just the use of the year as we know it (2001), which is derived from
>the birth of Christ, could be seen by a few nutters as not "PC".
>WGAF?Here in Indonesia, which is about 90% Muslim, the Christian year
>is always used in dates, although the Muslim year is often included,
>too, in anything relating to religion. Nobody seems to get upset - I
>think they've all gotten over it by now. Seems a mature attitude to me!
>:-)
>Regards,

Reckon we can use the same logic to persuade the States to go metric? :)
AndrewF

Now now now, Andrew, no international incidents please. <g> What is special appeal of metric exclusivity? We learn and use both metric and English systems. Science is entirely metric, and in any case conversion between them is easy, with the possible exception of weights. (OK, farenheit sucks, I give you that. It's unspellable for one thing.)

But must there be no bourbon because there is scotch?

When metric is as useful as feet for calculating fill flash, I'll switch entirely. Unless there's a 5-4 decision from the Supreme Court beforehand ...

Happy Independence Day to whom it is meaningful, and cheers to all,

Joel W.
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz