Curtis,
Personally, I'd go with an OM-G. That's what my daughters have. You can
find them, with a little patience, for around $50 with a 50/1.8. Perfect
starter camera. They get to share most of the toys I have, and at $50,
they're almost disposable (not really, but dropping one and killing it
wouldn't make me freak).
The OM-PC is nice too, but more money. The Program mode is a nice feature
though.
TOm
> I just noticed that the rewind crank on my OM-4T seems to be missing
> something - namely, the knurled knob (sorry for the alliteration!) that
one
> grasps when rewinding a roll of film.... all I have is a very thin shaft
> protruding from the flat body of the crank arm. I've had the camera for
> about three months, and can't honestly say if this part has been missing
> all along. None the less, is this an easy part to obtain/replace? The
> little thin pin often slips out of my fingers during the rewind process,
> releasing the tension in the roll and necessitating extra turns to again
> take up the slack....
>
> Also, I'm contemplating another body, for my sons to use on occasion. Any
> suggestions relative to an OM-G, OM-PC or OM-2000(!)? The OM-2000 is only
a
> consideration because I can call up B&H and buy a new one with minimal
> hassle..... Any words on expected cost for the -G or -PC?
>
> Thanx!
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|