That is a fascinating exchange. The arrogance of the Times is amazing:
"because we held your print, it is more valuable and therefore ours". What
kind of twisted lawyer logic is that. They neglected to return his
property. So what? It is still his property.
Any attorney's on the list care to share their thoughts?
Tom
>
> This URL appeared on the Leica list today
>
> http://www.cjr.org/year/01/3/photo.asp
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|