Subject: | Re: [OM] OM-4 vs. OM-4T |
---|---|
From: | Chris Charlton <c_charlton@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sat, 23 Jun 2001 00:33:54 +0100 (BST) |
What other camera bodies in the OM series are compatible with the rewind function of the motordrive? --- Walt Wayman <HIWAYMAN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >From a recent discussion, I ended up wondering > about this: > > >What are the differences between the OM-4 and the > OM-4T(i)?< > > With the 4T(i) you get film rewind using the motor > drive. Not so with the > 4. > > Walt Wayman > > < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing > List > > < For questions, > mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > < Web Page: > http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > > ____________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Panoramas, andrew fildes |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] OM-4 vs. OM-4T, Chris Charlton |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] OM-4 vs. OM-4T, Walt Wayman |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] OM-4 vs. OM-4T, Craig Henrikson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |