Subject: | Re: [OM] user opinions of 85-250/5 and 65-200/4.. |
---|---|
From: | johnsonpa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Date: | Wed, 20 Jun 2001 16:35:56 -0500 |
I've heard no mention of the 50-250/5. Where does it fit in the mix (personal impression)? Gary's lens test seem to suggest that the 35mm on the wide side might not be worth the extra cash for the lens. Then again 50-250mm plus a wide angle would cover just about all my out-and-about shooting. Any thoughts? --p.j. < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] TTL Flash, Marcin Kost |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Father's Day Post-Mortem, Joel Wilcox |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] user opinions of 85-250/5 and 65-200/4.., Joel Wilcox |
Next by Thread: | [OM] OM LIST ( strange), John Duggan |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |