Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: AW: [OM] OM 1N vs OM 2 N

Subject: Re: AW: [OM] OM 1N vs OM 2 N
From: "Scott Nelson" <SNelson@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 10:13:28 -0400
That's correct, with the OM1N the viewfinder only shows a flash ready light, no 
TTL, for that you need an OM2N.

>>> Rainer.Wagner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 01:48:46 05/29/2001 >>>
Hi Faisal,
the OM1 and OM1n has no TTL flash support at all, only manual and the auto
mode built into most flashes can be used.
For more please consult  http://www.taiga.ca/~esif/om-sif/bodygroup/om1.htm 
Rainer


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]Im Auftrag von Faisal Khan
Gesendet: Dienstag, 29. Mai 2001 09:18
An: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Betreff: [OM] OM 1N vs OM 2 N


Thanks everyone

now im confident that 1N is not a bad choice and that
my love for that piece is true.  Did I heard Michael
Virsinger saying it wont be a good choice for flash
photography but it has got a shoe 4 on the top...means
full TTL support like the OM 2N..am I rite

the body here costs Rs 9000 some $150.

thanks

Faisal

____________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk 
or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie 

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: AW: [OM] OM 1N vs OM 2 N, Scott Nelson <=
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz