Subject: | Re: [OM] OM Article |
---|---|
From: | "Joel Wilcox" <jdubikins@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sun, 27 May 2001 16:32:14 -0500 |
From: Clyde Soles <csoles@xxxxxxx>Maybe he is unaware of the distortion?At 05:24 PM Sunday 27/05/2001, you wrote:Take note, for all that has been said about the zuiko 35 - 80 F 2.8, heseems happy with it. Realistically, would anybody notice unless they are shooting brick walls? Seems like much ado about nothing to me. Now the vignetting at 35mm is a different issue that will crop up more often. I guess I need to restate that my shots were made at f4 (apropos the vignetting) and that distortion and vignetting are almost entirely gone at 40mm. If one has realistic expectations, it is a zoom for which no apologies are necessary. Joel W. _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] RE:(OT) George Mallory's 1924 Camera on Mt. Everest, Mike Lazzari |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Some ramblings about my 2n, Father-son bonding and a question, Sam Shiell |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] OM Article, John Prosper |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] OM Article, Larry |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |