I have OM and OL adapters and all the OL are "correct"
Bruce Kolber
St. Petersburg, FL 33715
USA
----- Original Message -----
From: <rdk@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 5:18 AM
Subject: Re: [OM] Tamron lens and adaptall 2
>
>
>
> I have the SP 35-105/2.8, SP 35-210/3.5-4.2, SP 60-300/3.8-5.4,
80-210/3.8-4, SP
> 350/5.6, and 2 2X SP converters; very happy with all of them, especially
the
> 35-105....
>
> Re the adaptall2 lens mounts, I was very surprised to discover that one of
my
> adaptalls with 'OL' marking had the badly-placed screw hole that needed
filling
> in with epoxy to use with my OM-4Ti's. I had thought that adapters marked
'OL'
> were OK, but those marked 'for Olympus OM' always needed modification.
Does
> anyone else have a 'bad' OL adapter?
>
> Roger Key
>
>
>
>
> <<<Actually, I have quite a few
> Tamrons (90 f2.5 SP, 500 f8 SP cat, 28-80 f3.5-4.2 SP,
> 28-135 f4-4.5 SP,
> 70-210 f3.5 SP, 60-300 f3.8-5.4 SP, and 2X SP
> converter).....I like all of
> them......any other folks have Tamrons?
>
> Bruce Kolber>>>
>
> >I have the 35-105/2.8, 80-200/2.8, 350/5.6, 400/4 and
> >500/8. All are quite good for their cost.
>
> >Warren
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|