Subject: | Re: [OM] Optics 102: Aging, Apparent Focusing Distance reference, et. al. |
---|---|
From: | andrew fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 22 May 2001 19:11:28 +1000 |
Good point. I need a +1.5 diopter for reading but this is too strong for computing as the screen is (and should be) further away than a book when reading. I bought a pair of $10 specials from the chemist - +1 - and keep them with the pooter. Perfect. AndrewF >Susan > >One warning I will mention about shifting your head back to see a computer >screen with trifocals is that we often look at the screen for long periods >of time. I ended up having to have my neck in traction 3 times a week >because I had compressed some nerves. This caused numbing in my arm and >hand. I now am very careful about tilting my head back searching for the >sweet spot. Instead I try to make sure that I am sitting higher in the >chair and looking more down at screen. This works for me and I have not had >anymore trouble with my neck. > >Bob Winters < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] [OT] - burned on ebay, andrew fildes |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Alaska cruise kit & a little OT stuff, Steve Dropkin |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Optics 102: Aging, Apparent Focusing Distance reference, et. al., Robert Winters |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Optics 102: Aging, Apparent Focusing Distance reference, et. al., Dirk Wright |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |