On Mon, 21 May 2001, Andrew Dacey wrote:
> Some of you may remember that back in March I bought my first Olympus (an
> OM-1n) with a 50mm 1.8. Since then I've picked up the following lenses:
>
> 21mm 3.5
> 24mm 2.8
> 28mm 2.8
> 35mm 2.0
>
> And I've just sent off my payment for another OM-1n! Is this a bad sign?
>
Andrew: Well, you still need at least the 85/2 and 200/4 (or
180/2.8)....and a OM2s/p, because you cannot be without
spot-metering. Ohh, and a couple of T32's, just because. Of course, then
you are going to take up macro photography......
;)
--
Mange hilsner / Sincerely
-------------------------------------------
Thomas Heide Clausen
Civilingeniør i Datateknik (cand.polyt)
M.Sc in Computer Engineering
E-Mail: T.Clausen@xxxxxxxxxxxx
WWW: http://www.cs.auc.dk/~voop
-------------------------------------------
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|